We are discussing another chapter in "Mere Christianity" again today...
Lewis has a thoughtful chapter about ‘being in love and discusses the
difference between the excitement of infatuation and the permanence of
a quieter, more solid, lasting love. This is good stuff.
What we call ‘being in love’ is, in
several ways, good for us. It helps to make us generous and courageous,
it opens our eyes not only to the beauty of the beloved but to all
beauty, and it subordinates (especially at first) our merely animal
sexuality; in that sense, love is the great conqueror of lust. No one in
his senses would deny that being in love is far better than either
common sensuality or cold self-centredness.
But, as I said before, ‘the
most dangerous thing you can do is to take any one impulse of our own
nature and set it up as the thing you ought to follow at all costs’.
Being in love is a good thing, but it is not the best thing. There are
many things below it, but there are also things above it. You cannot
make it the basis of a whole life. It is a noble feeling, but it is
still a feeling. Now no feeling can be relied on to last in its full
intensity, or even to last at all. Knowledge can last, principles can
last, habits can last; but feelings come and go.
And in fact, whatever
people say, the state called ‘being in love’ usually does not last. If
the old fairy-tale ending ‘They lived happily ever after’ is taken to
mean ‘They felt for the next fifty years exactly as they felt the day
before they were married,’ then it says what probably never was nor ever
would be true, and would be highly undesirable if it were. Who could
bear to live in that excitement for even five years? What would become
of your work, your appetite, your sleep, your friendships?
But, of
course, ceasing to be ‘in love’ need not mean ceasing to love. Love in
this second sense-love as distinct from ‘being in love’-is not merely a
feeling. It is a deep unity, maintained by the will and deliberately
strengthened by habit; reinforced by (in Christian marriages) the grace
which both partners ask, and receive, from God.
They can have this love
for each other even at those moments when they do not like each other;
as you love yourself even when you do not like yourself. They can retain
this love even when each would easily, if they allowed themselves, be
‘in love’ with someone else.
‘Being in love’ first moved them to promise
fidelity: this quieter love enables them to keep the promise. It is on
this love that the engine of marriage is run: being in love was the
explosion that started it.
(to view previous posts on this blog click HOME above)
No comments:
Post a Comment